![]() Economically they play an important role as groundwater reservoirs as well as host rocks for hydrocarbons in deeply buried systems. Both models are compared with field observations to provide the closest match with the observations, providing typical values of debris flow parameters for the various flow laws.Īlluvial fans serve as useful archives that record the history of depositional and erosional processes in mountainous regions and thus can reveal the environmental controls that influenced their development. Debris flow laws include the Herschel-Bulkley and general viscoplastic formulations. The WAF-DF is based on the Weighted Average Flux method and has been successfully applied to describe debris flow propagation and the propagation of roll waves superimposed on debris flows. The DFEM model uses the finite element method debris flow friction relations, or flow laws, include the Voellmy fluid, simplified Bingham, and dilatant/grain shearing relations. Both models solve the shallow water equations and incorporate a frictional resistance term that describes the properties of flowing debris. Here we systematically compare a wide variety of debris flow laws using two one dimensional numerical simulation models of debris flows and field data from an automated debris flow observation station at the Illgraben torrent, Switzerland. Practical application requires knowledge of the typical range of parameters as well as knowledge of the suitability of the flow laws to the torrent under investigation. Many friction relations or flow laws have been proposed to describe the flow and stopping behavior of debris flows. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |